Processing a dynamic visual-spatial language: psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language
- PMID: 8366475
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01067829
Processing a dynamic visual-spatial language: psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language
Abstract
American Sign Language (ASL) has evolved within a completely different biological medium, using the hands and face rather than the vocal tract and perceived by eye rather than by ear. The research reviewed in this article addresses the consequences of this different modality for language processing, linguistic structure, and spatial cognition. Language modality appears to affect aspects of lexical recognition and the nature of the grammatical form used for reference. Select aspects of nonlinguistic spatial cognition (visual imagery and face discrimination) appear to be enhanced in deaf and hearing ASL signers. It is hypothesized that this enhancement is due to experience with a visual-spatial language and is tied to specific linguistic processing requirements (interpretation of grammatical facial expression, perspective transformations, and the use of topographic classifiers). In addition, adult deaf signers differ in the age at which they were first exposed to ASL during childhood. The effect of late acquisition of language on linguistic processing is investigated in several studies. The results show selective effects of late exposure to ASL on language processing, independent of grammatical knowledge.
Similar articles
-
Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers.Cognition. 1993 Feb;46(2):139-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90017-p. Cognition. 1993. PMID: 8432094
-
Atypical signed language development: a case study of challenges with visual-spatial processing.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(5):332-59. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2013.863756. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013. PMID: 24344817
-
Visual-spatial processing in deaf brain-damaged signers.Brain Cogn. 1984 Jul;3(3):281-306. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(84)90022-8. Brain Cogn. 1984. PMID: 6536330
-
Sign language aphasia.Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;185:297-315. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823384-9.00019-0. Handb Clin Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35078607 Review.
-
Functional and structural brain asymmetries in sign language processing.Handb Clin Neurol. 2025;208:327-350. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00021-X. Handb Clin Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40074405 Review.
Cited by
-
Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners.J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Mar;30(2):185-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1010329912848. J Psycholinguist Res. 2001. PMID: 11385825
-
Laughter among deaf signers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006 Fall;11(4):403-9. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enl008. Epub 2006 Aug 4. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2006. PMID: 16891353 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Jan;22(1):9-21. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw054. Epub 2016 Sep 13. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017. PMID: 27624307 Free PMC article.
-
Cognition and functional outcome among deaf and hearing people with schizophrenia.Schizophr Res. 2007 Aug;94(1-3):187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 7. Schizophr Res. 2007. PMID: 17560083 Free PMC article.
-
Viewing angle matters in British Sign Language processing.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):1043. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51330-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38200108 Free PMC article.