Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;12(2):97-104.
doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)81016-0.

The incidence and clinical features of anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia in Australia

Affiliations

The incidence and clinical features of anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia in Australia

M M Fisher et al. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1993.

Abstract

The details of 826 patients referred to an Anaesthetic Allergy Clinic over a 17-year period are described. 443 were classified as having severe immediate anaphylactic reactions and in the majority of these (263) a muscle relaxant was involved. In Australia, the most common cause of a reaction is alcuronium, which probably reflects usage, although it is the most commonly found to give a positive skin test in relaxant reactors. Suxamethonium and atracurium appear to have an incidence of reactions greater than predicted by market share and pancuronium and vecuronium appear safer both on incidence of reactions and on positive skin tests in reactors. The incidence of reactions is between 1:10,000 and 1:20,000 anaesthetics. Patients who react have greater incidence of allergy, atopy, asthma and previous reactions than non reactors. Previous exposure is usually apparent in reactors to induction agents but not muscle relaxants. Cardiovascular collapse is the most common presenting problem and is the only problem in 10%. Skin changes are the next most common and then bronchospasm which may be transient and is the hardest feature to treat. With an investigation protocol based on history, skin and RIA testing subsequent anaesthesia is usually safe.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources