A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections
- PMID: 8371127
- DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739229
A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections
Abstract
One hundred and forty-five children with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections were entered into this multicentre, General Practice, investigator-blind study, designed to demonstrate equivalent efficacy between clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions. Seventy one children were randomised to treatment with clarithromycin suspension 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight twice daily and 74 to treatment with amoxycillin suspension 125 mg (bodyweight < 25 kg) or 250 mg (bodyweight > or = 25 kg) three times a day according to bodyweight. Duration of therapy was 5-10 days as determined by the investigator. Clinical evaluations were performed pretreatment, during treatment and post-treatment within 72 hours of cessation of therapy. Fifty two children in the clarithromycin group and 57 in the amoxycillin group were clinically evaluable. Both study medications were effective and there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to clinical cure rate (60% for clarithromycin and 63% for amoxycillin), clinical success rate (cure plus improvement, 96% for clarithromycin and 95% for amoxycillin) or rate of resolution of clinical signs and symptoms in clinically evaluable patients. The intention to treat analysis for all patients entered similarly showed no significant differences in efficacy. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to incidence or severity of adverse events which were generally mild and associated with the gastrointestinal system. Therapy was withdrawn because of adverse events in three children on clarithromycin and one on amoxycillin. Bacteriological cure rates could not be determined because of an insufficient number of evaluable pre-treatment sputum samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.Drugs. 1997 Jun;53(6):973-1004. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753060-00006. Drugs. 1997. PMID: 9179528 Review.
-
A comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media.Infection. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):272-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01728911. Infection. 1993. PMID: 8225637 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of amoxycillin and clarithromycin as initial treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jun;46(407):357-60. Br J Gen Pract. 1996. PMID: 8983255 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clarithromycin vs. amoxicillin suspensions in the treatment of pediatric patients with acute otitis media.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Dec;12(12 Suppl 3):S118-21. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199312003-00005. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993. PMID: 8295812 Clinical Trial.
-
Azithromycin. A review of its use in paediatric infectious diseases.Drugs. 1998 Aug;56(2):273-97. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856020-00014. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9711451 Review.
Cited by
-
In vitro activity and pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters of clarithromycin and azithromycin: why they matter in the treatment of respiratory tract infections.Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Mar 8;12:585-596. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S187226. eCollection 2019. Infect Drug Resist. 2019. PMID: 30881064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients.Drugs. 1997 Jun;53(6):973-1004. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753060-00006. Drugs. 1997. PMID: 9179528 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical