[The value of colon contrast enema in ileus diagnosis]

Abstract

In 115 patients with clinical and radiological signs of small and/or large bowel obstruction the contrast enema of the colon was evaluated prospectively to localize the site of occlusion in the colon. Contrast enema was performed in 76 patients with Gastrografin and in 39 with barium. In 22 of 24 patients with large bowel obstruction, in 7 of 11 with combined small and large bowel obstruction, in 4 of 14 with small bowel obstruction and in 19 of 66 with partial obstruction the site of obstruction was identified in the colon. In 107 of 115 patients the site of intestinal obstruction in the colon was either confirmed or excluded (sensitivity 89.2%, specificity 96.6%). In 6 patients the contrast enema failed due to incontinence, missing cooperation or insufficient preparation. In two cases with coprostasis the occlusion was missinterpreted as a carcinoma. Electrolytes and serum fluid concentration before and after the enema were not significantly influenced using the different contrast media. Contrast enema is indicated in patients with intestinal obstruction of unknown site, malignancies, after radiation therapy and recurrent partial obstruction.