Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective
- PMID: 8378462
Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective
Abstract
Recent position statements by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the emergence of legal and ethical analyses on the nature of compelled cesarean section have instigated much discussion on how the primary care physician should respond when a pregnant woman refuses to consent to surgery. This article clarifies the ethical obligations of the physician and mother and the nature of their relationships to the fetus. The formulation of an agreement, the physician-mother-fetal contract, is discussed as a teaching tool for helping to clarify the roles of all parties. Also, the function of the primary care physician as proactive educator is highlighted.
Similar articles
-
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period.J Clin Ethics. 1991 Spring;2(1):23-4. J Clin Ethics. 1991. PMID: 11642910
-
Fetal therapy and surgery. Fetal rights versus maternal obligations.N Y State J Med. 1989 Feb;89(2):80-4. N Y State J Med. 1989. PMID: 2710438 No abstract available.
-
An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;82(6):1029-35. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8233254
-
Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Life, liberty, and law in conflict.JAMA. 1988 Feb 19;259(7):1060-6. JAMA. 1988. PMID: 3276942 Review.
-
Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.J Leg Med. 1989 Mar;10(1):211-49. doi: 10.1080/01947648909513570. J Leg Med. 1989. PMID: 2651546 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical