Effect of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus neuron size in normal hearing kittens
- PMID: 8379304
- DOI: 10.3109/00016489309135851
Effect of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus neuron size in normal hearing kittens
Abstract
Very young cochlear-implant candidates may have undetected islands of residual hearing. Would the maturation of these functioning auditory neurons be affected by chronic cochlear stimulation? This was tested by examining neuron sizes in the cochlear nuclei of young, normal hearing kittens with and without chronic cochlear stimulation. Six animals received bilateral intra- or extracochlear implants and were electrically stimulated unilaterally for periods of 1,000-1,500 hours. After sacrifice, cross-sectional areas of approximately 11,000 neurons somata in the cochlear nuclei were measured with an image-analysis system. There were statistically significant differences between stimulated and unstimulated nuclei, especially the posteroventral cochlear nucleus (PVCN), in individual cats, but the directions of the differences were inconsistent. Overall, there was no significant effect of electrical stimulation on soma size. These results indicate that chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve has no positive or negative trophic effects on otherwise innervated, maturing cochlear nucleus neurons.
Similar articles
-
[The effects of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus in normal hearing kittens].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1993 Jan;73(1):20-2, 61. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1993. PMID: 8389230 Chinese.
-
Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.Hear Res. 1994 Dec;81(1-2):150-66. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90162-7. Hear Res. 1994. PMID: 7737922
-
Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?Hear Res. 2007 Mar;225(1-2):60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 15. Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17258411 Free PMC article.
-
Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants.Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Nov-Dec;6(6):305-18. doi: 10.1159/000046843. Audiol Neurootol. 2001. PMID: 11847461 Review.
-
Cochlear pathology. Hazards of long-term implants.Arch Otolaryngol. 1984 Mar;110(3):164-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1984.00800290028006. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984. PMID: 6367727 Review.
Cited by
-
Synaptic morphology and the influence of auditory experience.Hear Res. 2011 Sep;279(1-2):118-30. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21310226 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.J Comp Neurol. 2010 Jun 15;518(12):2382-404. doi: 10.1002/cne.22339. J Comp Neurol. 2010. PMID: 20437534 Free PMC article.
-
Study on Recovery Strategy of Hearing Loss & SGN Regeneration Under Physical Regulation.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Feb;12(5):e2410919. doi: 10.1002/advs.202410919. Epub 2024 Dec 23. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025. PMID: 39716878 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous