Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Jan 3;11(2):75-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00562895.

The ambiguity of adverse drug reactions

The ambiguity of adverse drug reactions

J Koch-Weser et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Three clinical pharmacologists independently evaluated 500 untoward clinical events reported by physicians as adverse drug reactions (ADRs). They often disagreed with the reporting physicians and with each other. They judged 14.4-28.2% of the events to be definite, 26.4-38.0% probable, 21.4-31.0% possible and 15.8-28.2% of the events to be definite, 26.4-38.0% probable, 21.4-31.0% possible and 15.8-28.2% unlikely ADRs. In their opinion 19.1-32.4% of the drugs blamed were definitely, 29.8-34.4% probably, 24.9-36.7% possibly and 8.4-14.5% not responsible for the adverse reactions. Evaluators disagreed among themselves about the drug most likely to have been responsible in 36.4% of the events, about ADRs causing hospital admission in 56.8%, about severe ADR morbidity in 55.8%, about ADR prolongation of hospitalization in 67.3% and ADR prolongation of hospitalization in 67.3% and about ADR contribution to death in 71.0%. The divergence of judgements suggests that suspected ADRs are usually ambiguous clinical events, and that incidence, severity, medical consequences and cost of ADRs can only be estimated.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. JAMA. 1976 Aug 9;236(6):575-8 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1975 Dec 22;234(12):1236-41 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1969 Jan 2;280(1):20-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 Jul;16(1):110-23 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1968 Sep 26;279(13):678-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources