Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Jun;3(3):201-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF01826234.

Long-term variability and reproducibility of resting human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest, as reassessed after a decade

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Long-term variability and reproducibility of resting human muscle nerve sympathetic activity at rest, as reassessed after a decade

J Fagius et al. Clin Auton Res. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity measured by microneurography during supine rest is known to vary considerably between healthy subjects, whereas in a given individual the level of muscle nerve sympathetic activity is stable over weeks and months. To further characterize long-term variability or reproducibility microneurographic recordings of muscle nerve sympathetic activity were performed in 15 healthy, normotensive subjects (mean age 51 years) who had undergone the same procedure between 10 and 14 years earlier (mean 12 years). The range of muscle nerve sympathetic activity was 9-59 in the first and 13-61 bursts/min in the second recording. Subjects maintained the level of muscle nerve sympathetic activity displayed previously, although with a slight but significant tendency to a higher outflow with increasing age. It is concluded that muscle nerve sympathetic activity is characterized by large inter-individual differences and strong intra-individual reproducibility over many years, with a tendency to increase with age. The age relationship is only in a minor part responsible for the variability, the cause of which remains unexplained. Because of the marked difference between individuals, strict normality criteria are difficult to define when comparing groups of subjects. There remains the risk of either obtaining spurious differences or obscuring a true abnormality. This is unlikely to apply when results in individual subjects are compared.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Circulation. 1986 May;73(5):913-9 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1978 Jan;274:621-37 - PubMed
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1983;119(2):117-21 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1989 Nov;84(5):1403-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1977 Sep;101(1):43-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources