Inter-observer variation in assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination
- PMID: 8402021
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb00682.x
Inter-observer variation in assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination
Abstract
In a prospective study, inter-observer variation in the assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination (DRE) by a urologist and a general practitioner was analysed. The 2 physicians performed independent assessment of the prostate in 933 men aged 50 to 69 years with regard to 9 variables as part of a screening programme for carcinoma of the prostate. Complete agreement for all observations was reached in 46.5% of the men. Using kappa (K) statistics, the values were adjusted for the expected chance agreement. K values between 0.485 and 0.682 were obtained for 6 variables representing good agreement; these were size, tenderness, midline furrow, symmetry, induration and nodularity. Agreement regarding fixation, lateral sulci and seminal vesicles was poor owing to the small number of cases deviating from normal. Contrary to the general belief that DRE is highly subjective, our results show a good correspondence between the observations of the examiners when assessing the prostate in a systematic way.
Similar articles
-
Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer.Urology. 1995 Jan;45(1):70-4. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(95)96812-1. Urology. 1995. PMID: 7529449 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective evaluation on the effect of interobserver variability of digital rectal examination on the performance of the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.Int J Urol. 2017 Dec;24(12):826-832. doi: 10.1111/iju.13442. Epub 2017 Sep 13. Int J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28901582
-
The interobserver variability of digital rectal examination in a large randomized trial for the screening of prostate cancer.Prostate. 2008 Jun 15;68(9):985-93. doi: 10.1002/pros.20759. Prostate. 2008. PMID: 18409186 Clinical Trial.
-
Interobserver variation of prostatic volume estimation with digital rectal examination by urological staffs with different experiences.Int Braz J Urol. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):466-71. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382004000600003. Int Braz J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15663803
-
[Screening of prostate carcinoma].Ther Umsch. 1995 Jun;52(6):393-8. Ther Umsch. 1995. PMID: 7541568 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The Utility of Digital Rectal Examination in Estimating Prostate Volume in a Rural Hospital Setting.Niger J Surg. 2015 Jul-Dec;21(2):111-4. doi: 10.4103/1117-6806.162570. Niger J Surg. 2015. PMID: 26425063 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostate cancer screening.Environ Health Prev Med. 2000 Oct;5(3):111-7. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.2000.111. Environ Health Prev Med. 2000. PMID: 21432194 Free PMC article.
-
Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up.BMJ. 2011 Mar 31;342:d1539. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1539. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21454449 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cancer recognition and primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jan;52(474):5-6. Br J Gen Pract. 2002. PMID: 11791817 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Dichotomous estimation of prostate volume: a diagnostic study of the accuracy of the digital rectal examination.World J Mens Health. 2013 Dec;31(3):220-5. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2013.31.3.220. Epub 2013 Dec 24. World J Mens Health. 2013. PMID: 24459655 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical