Quality of life assessment of patients with posttraumatic fracture nonunion, chronic refractory osteomyelitis, and lower-extremity amputation

Abstract

One hundred nine patients with long-bone fracture nonunion, chronic refractory osteomyelitis, and posttraumatic amputation were evaluated to assess the impact of chronic disability on the quality of life. The quality of life parameters were defined by a functional assessment instrument, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS), and a Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS). A spouse PAIS self-report instrument was administered to assess the psychosocial adjustment of spouses or significant others. A final questionnaire was developed to determine the reasons, in order of their importance, for either continuing medical therapy or accepting amputation. The PAIS scores differed significantly between osteomyelitis patients and nonunion or amputation patients. The presence or absence of pain produced significant differences in AIMS and PAIS scores of nonunion and osteomyelitis patients. Subscale analysis of AIMS scores showed significant differences among the three groups with respect to health perception and scale of orthopaedic problem. The osteomyelitis patients were more severely affected than the nonunion or amputation patients. The PAIS was unable to detect any statistically significant differences in psychosocial adjustment of the spouses of patients in each of the three population groups. The most frequent reason for continuing medical and surgical management of nonunion and osteomyelitis was hopeful expectation for cure. The group who chose amputation did so in an attempt to put an end to the need for medical and surgical treatment. Differences in psychosocial and functional ability were related to disease diagnosis, pain, status of fracture healing, and timing of amputation. This study provides further insight into the quality of life experience for patients with long-term orthopaedic problems.