Sequential regimen of the antiprogesterone RU486 and synthetic progestin for contraception

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of sequential use of the antiprogesterone RU486 and synthetic progestin on ovarian function of healthy women.

Design: Healthy women were given a sequential antiprogesterone-progestin treatment. Blood samples were taken twice a week during one control cycle and one to three treatment cycles; prospective analysis.

Setting: The outpatient clinic of the Helsinki City Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, and Steroid Research Laboratory, Department of Medical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Patients: Eleven healthy women, volunteers, 20 to 34 years of age.

Interventions: A dose of 25 mg/d of RU486 was given during cycle days 1 to 21, and synthetic progestin (5 mg of norethisterone to six and 5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate to five women) during cycle days 22 to 31.

Main outcome measures: Serum P, E2, FSH, and LH were measured from serum samples.

Results: In 20 of the 24 treatment cycles analyzed the serum concentrations of P were anovulatory. In the remaining 4 cycles, P levels rose above 3 ng/mL, suggestive of ovulation. Folliculogenesis was not completely inhibited, but serum E2 profiles were subnormal and delayed. Bleeding control was satisfactory.

Conclusions: Antiprogesterone RU486 hampers or delays follicular development, suggesting a possible use as an estrogen-free oral contraceptive. However, the synthetic progestins used in this regimen induced serum P rises in some cycles. The synthetic progestin provides the cycle control, but its possible effect on the reliability of the method remains to be evaluated.

PIP: To assess the effectiveness of an estrogen-free oral contraceptive (OC) involving the sequential administration of an antiprogesterone and synthetic progestin, 11 healthy Finnish women 20-34 years of age were enrolled in a prospective investigation for 1-3 cycles. 25 mg of RU-486 was administered for the first 21 days of the cycle, followed by 5 mg of norethisterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate for the next 10 days. It was hypothesized that prolonged RU-486 administration would prevent the follicle from surviving for ovulation. During the RU-486 phase, P increases above 3 ng/ml (suggestive of ovulation) were recorded in only four of the 24 treatment cycles analyzed. Mean serum estradiol concentrations were 147 pg/ml in ovulatory women and 72 pg/ml in anovulatory women, indicating that follicle development was subnormal and delayed, but not completely inhibited. Baseline secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) increased during RU-486 administration, while an LH surge greater than 100% over baseline was recorded in the majority of cycles during progestin administration. No significant changes occurred in follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Menstrual bleeding began 1-5 days after progestin discontinuation; women who took norethisterone experienced no breakthrough bleeding or spotting during treatment. It is concluded that the main antiovulatory effect of RU-486 is attributable to its antiprogestational effect on the preovulatory P rise.