Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Nov;13(6):1013-9.
doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.127.

Fastigial stimulation increases ischemic blood flow and reduces brain damage after focal ischemia

Affiliations

Fastigial stimulation increases ischemic blood flow and reduces brain damage after focal ischemia

F Zhang et al. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993 Nov.

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the cerebellar fastigial nucleus (FN) increases CBF and reduces brain damage after focal ischemia. We studied whether FN stimulation "protects" the brain from ischemic damage by increasing blood flow to the ischemic territory. Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized (halothane 1-3%) and artificially ventilated through a tracheal cannula inserted transorally. CBF was monitored by a laser-Doppler probe placed over the convexity at a site corresponding to the area spared from infarction by FN stimulation. Arterial pressure (AP), blood gases, and body temperature were controlled, and the electroencephalogram (EEG) was monitored. The stem of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was occluded. After occlusion, the FN was stimulated for 60 min (100 microA; 50 Hz; 1 s on-1 s off) while AP was maintained at 97 +/- 11 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) by controlled hemorrhage. Rats were then allowed to recover, and infarct volume was determined 24 h later in thionin-stained sections. In unstimulated rats (n = 7), proximal MCA occlusion reduced CBF and the amplitude of the EEG. One day later, these rats had infarcts involving neocortex and striatum. FN stimulation after MCA occlusion (n = 12) enhanced CBF and EEG recovery [61 +/- 34 and 73 +/- 43%, respectively at 60 min; p < 0.05 vs. unstimulated group; analysis of variance (ANOVA)] and reduced the volume of the cortical infarct by 48% (p < 0.05). In contrast, hypercapnia (PCO2 = 64 +/- 4; n = 7) did not affect CBF and EEG recovery or infarct volume (p > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Infarct measurement methodology.
    Swanson RA, Sharp FR. Swanson RA, et al. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994 Jul;14(4):697-8. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.88. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994. PMID: 7516936 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources