Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993:9 Suppl 1:3-10.
doi: 10.1007/BF01143141.

Assessment of viability after myocardial infarction. Clinical relevance and methodological problems

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of viability after myocardial infarction. Clinical relevance and methodological problems

G Fragasso et al. Int J Card Imaging. 1993.

Abstract

In patients with myocardial infarction, the distinction between reversible and irreversible ventricular dysfunction has important clinical implications since dysfunctional but viable myocardium will resume contraction following revascularization. Various methods have been developed for the identification of potentially reversible myocardial dysfunction. Thallium reinjection, immediately after stress-redistribution imaging, may provide evidence of myocardial viability by demonstrating thallium uptake in regions with apparently 'irreversible' defects. Hypoperfused, hypocontractile segments may recover function after revascularization, when exhibiting increased 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose uptake on positron emission tomography. Improved contractile function by selective beta 1 adrenergic stimulation with low dose dobutamine may also indicate the presence of viable tissue and predict subsequent improvement upon restoration of adequate flow. Finally, exercise-induced ST segment elevation on leads exploring a recent myocardial infarction has also been shown to indicate the presence of viable, potentially salvageable tissue. We discuss here these and several other methods that have been proposed for the detection of residual myocardial viability. Their advantages, limitations, and relevance to clinical problems are also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1987 Jan-Feb;29(4):293-323 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1975 Nov;52(5):810-6 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1992 Apr;85(4):1347-53 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Apr;19(5):948-52 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jul 22;307(4):212-6 - PubMed