Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals
- PMID: 8414897
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03205274
Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals
Abstract
Experiments 1 and 2 compared, with a single-stimulus procedure, the discrimination of filled and empty intervals in both auditory and visual modalities. In Experiment 1, in which intervals were about 250 msec, the discrimination was superior with empty intervals in both modalities. In Experiment 2, with intervals lasting about 50 msec, empty intervals showed superior performance with visual signals only. In Experiment 3, for the auditory modality at 250 msec, the discrimination was easier with empty intervals than with filled intervals with both the forced-choice (FC) and the single stimulus (SS) modes of presentation, and the discrimination was easier with the FC than with the SS method. Experiment 4, however, showed that at 50 and 250 msec, with a FC-adaptive procedure, there were no differences between filled and empty intervals in the auditory mode; the differences observed with the visual mode in Experiments 1 and 2 remained significant. Finally, Experiment 5 compared differential thresholds for four marker-type conditions, filled and empty intervals in the auditory and visual modes, for durations ranging from .125 to 4 sec. The results showed (1) that the differential threshold differences among marker types are important for short durations but decrease with longer durations, and (2) that a generalized Weber's law generally holds for these conditions. The results as a whole are discussed in terms of timing mechanisms.
Similar articles
-
Differences in duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals as a function of base duration.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1591-600. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1591. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010. PMID: 20675803
-
Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: cognitive and perceptual factors.Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):565-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03207541. Percept Psychophys. 1991. PMID: 1780204
-
Sensory effects on judgments of short time-intervals.Psychol Res. 1998;61(4):261-8. doi: 10.1007/s004260050030. Psychol Res. 1998. PMID: 9870293
-
Perceptual learning in auditory temporal discrimination: no evidence for a cross-modal transfer to the visual modality.Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):382-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.382. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009. PMID: 19293111
-
The Processing of Short Time Intervals: Some Critical Issues.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:35-50. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_3. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38918345 Review.
Cited by
-
Markers' influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals.Percept Psychophys. 1996 Apr;58(3):424-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03206818. Percept Psychophys. 1996. PMID: 8935903
-
Perception of duration in the parvocellular system.Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Mar 28;6:14. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00014. eCollection 2012. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 22470323 Free PMC article.
-
Modality differences in timing and the filled-duration illusion: Testing the pacemaker rate explanation.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):823-845. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1630-8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019. PMID: 30569434 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of filled and empty intervals on clock and memory processes in pigeons.Learn Behav. 2014 Jun;42(2):153-63. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0134-1. Learn Behav. 2014. PMID: 24519455
-
Detecting violations of sensory expectancies following cerebellar degeneration: a mismatch negativity study.Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2569-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.016. Epub 2008 Apr 1. Neuropsychologia. 2008. PMID: 18486157 Free PMC article.