A comparison of rest sestamibi and rest-redistribution thallium single photon emission tomography: possible implications for myocardial viability detection in infarcted patients
- PMID: 8420779
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02261242
A comparison of rest sestamibi and rest-redistribution thallium single photon emission tomography: possible implications for myocardial viability detection in infarcted patients
Abstract
Thirty patients (26 men, 4 women, mean age 61 +/- 8 years) who had suffered myocardial infarction 15 +/- 6 months previously, were submitted to (1) standard stress-redistribution thallium-201 single photon emission tomography (SPET), (2) rest-redistribution 201T1 SPET and (3) stress-rest technetium-99m sestamibi SPET. Uptake modifications in relation to exercise-induced defects were evaluated in a total of 390 myocardial segments. Tracer uptake was scored as normal (=0), mildly reduced (=1), apparently reduced (=2), severely reduced (=3) or absent (=4). Comparison of stress studies failed to show any statistical difference (58% segmental abnormalities with sestamibi vs 61% with thallium). Uptake abnormalities (score 1-4) were detected in 55% of the segments with sestamibi, 55% with standard thallium redistribution, 55% with early imaging after thallium injection at rest and 54% with 3-h delayed rest imaging (P = NS). Absence of tracer uptake (score = 4) under resting conditions was recorded in 75 (19%) segments with standard 201T1 redistribution, 75 (19%) with rest sestamibi, 70 (18%) with rest 201T1 imaging and 62 (16%) with rst-redistribuion 201T1 (P < 0.05 vs other imaging modalities). Thus, 3-h delayed rest thallium imaging detected reversibility of uptake defects in a significantly higher number of myocardial segments. This finding might have important implications for both tracer and technique selection when myocardial viability is the main clinical issue.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous