Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Jan;10(1):14-21.
doi: 10.1023/a:1018956526016.

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of dl-threo-methylphenidate in humans

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of dl-threo-methylphenidate in humans

N R Srinivas et al. Pharm Res. 1993 Jan.

Abstract

A definitive enantioselective pharmacokinetic evaluation of dl-threo-methylphenidate (MPH) was carried out in 11 healthy volunteers, all of whom received, in a randomized crossover design, three oral administrations of MPH: immediate release (IR), slow release (SR), and SR chewed before swallowing (CH). In addition, all subjects received MPH intravenously (IV) on a separate occasion. Both plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 16 hr after each drug administration. Significant enantioselective differences were found in pharmacokinetic parameters such as CL, MRT, Vdss, AUC infinity 0, and t1/2. A profound distortion of the enantiomeric ratio for MPH (d >> 1) was evident in all plasma samples harvested after oral administration. After IV MPH, however, there was no significant distortion in the plasma d/l ratio until 1.5 hr after dosing, whereafter there was a divergence of the plasma levels of the enantiomers. After oral administration of dl-MPH, the absolute bioavailability (F) of d-MPH was 0.23 and that of l-MPH was 0.05. There were no significant differences in renal clearance for d- or l-MPH after oral or IV administration, although the fraction of the dose excreted unchanged in the urine was significantly greater after IV MPH. These data suggest that enantioselective differences in the pharmacokinetics of oral MPH are the result of enantioselectivity in presystemic metabolism rather than in renal excretion, such that l-MPH is preferentially converted into l-ritalinic acid. Finally, it was found that chewing the slow release formulation led to a pharmacokinetic profile very similar to that of MPH-IR, suggesting that MPH-SR should not be prescribed for children who chew tablets.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pediatrics. 1983 Jul;72(1):56-9 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983 Aug;226(2):382-6 - PubMed
    1. J Chromatogr. 1986 May 28;378(1):109-23 - PubMed
    1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 Dec;191(3):535-47 - PubMed
    1. Drugs. 1985 Oct;30(4):333-54 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources