Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Feb;217(2):115-21.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199302000-00004.

Efficacy of a beta-lactamase inhibitor combination for serious intraabdominal infections

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of a beta-lactamase inhibitor combination for serious intraabdominal infections

A P Walker et al. Ann Surg. 1993 Feb.

Abstract

A double-blind trial was conducted in 385 patients with suspected bacterial intra-abdominal infections to compare the efficacy and safety of ampicillin-sulbactam with cefoxitin. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 g ampicillin-sulbactam (2 g ampicillin-1 g sulbactam), or 2 g cefoxitin, every 6 hours. To be evaluable, patients had to demonstrate positive culture evidence of peritoneal infection at the time of operation. A total of 197 patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy. The two treatment groups were comparable in demographic features and in the presence of risk factors for infection. Clinical success (absence of infection and of adverse drug reaction) was observed in 86% of patients in the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 78% in the cefoxitin group. Eradication of infection occurred in 88% of the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 79% of the cefoxitin group. There were no differences in the nature or frequency of side effects observed in the two groups. Ampicillin-sulbactam demonstrated no difference in safety or efficacy when compared with cefoxitin in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections of bacterial origin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Probl Surg. 1979 Oct;16(10):1-65 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1992 Jan;127(1):83-9; discussion 89 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1981 Mar;193(3):318-23 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 May;154(5):715-20 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1983 Feb;118(2):242-9 - PubMed