Efficacy of a beta-lactamase inhibitor combination for serious intraabdominal infections
- PMID: 8439209
- PMCID: PMC1242749
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199302000-00004
Efficacy of a beta-lactamase inhibitor combination for serious intraabdominal infections
Abstract
A double-blind trial was conducted in 385 patients with suspected bacterial intra-abdominal infections to compare the efficacy and safety of ampicillin-sulbactam with cefoxitin. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 g ampicillin-sulbactam (2 g ampicillin-1 g sulbactam), or 2 g cefoxitin, every 6 hours. To be evaluable, patients had to demonstrate positive culture evidence of peritoneal infection at the time of operation. A total of 197 patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy. The two treatment groups were comparable in demographic features and in the presence of risk factors for infection. Clinical success (absence of infection and of adverse drug reaction) was observed in 86% of patients in the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 78% in the cefoxitin group. Eradication of infection occurred in 88% of the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 79% of the cefoxitin group. There were no differences in the nature or frequency of side effects observed in the two groups. Ampicillin-sulbactam demonstrated no difference in safety or efficacy when compared with cefoxitin in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections of bacterial origin.
Similar articles
-
Infectious complications after 809 biliary tract operations and results of a prospective randomized single-blind study comparing cefoxitin versus ampicillin plus an inhibitor of beta-lactamases.Infection. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01644184. Infection. 1990. PMID: 2179137 Clinical Trial.
-
Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin or cefoxitin in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections of bacterial etiology.Adv Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):139-46. Adv Ther. 1995. PMID: 10150324 Clinical Trial.
-
Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse.Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):464-71. doi: 10.1086/313971. Epub 2000 Sep 14. Clin Infect Dis. 2000. PMID: 10987706 Clinical Trial.
-
Sultamicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.Drugs. 1989 Apr;37(4):491-522. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937040-00005. Drugs. 1989. PMID: 2661196 Review.
-
Use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in pediatric infections: a re-evaluation.J Int Med Res. 2001 Jul-Aug;29(4):257-69. doi: 10.1177/147323000102900401. J Int Med Res. 2001. PMID: 11675898 Review.
Cited by
-
Changing trend in bile microbiology and antibiotic susceptibilities: over 12 years of experience.Infection. 2013 Feb;41(1):93-102. doi: 10.1007/s15010-012-0358-y. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Infection. 2013. PMID: 23180506
-
Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):913-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01690508. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 9031873
-
Essentials for selecting antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.Drugs. 2012 Apr 16;72(6):e17-32. doi: 10.2165/11599800-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22480338 Free PMC article.
-
Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intra-abdominal infections. The Intra-Abdominal Infection Study Group.Ann Surg. 1996 Mar;223(3):303-15. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199603000-00012. Ann Surg. 1996. PMID: 8604912 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ampicillin/sulbactam: current status in severe bacterial infections.Drugs. 2007;67(13):1829-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00003. Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17722953 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical