Adjuvant randomized trials of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/tamoxifen and CMF chemotherapy versus tamoxifen in women with node-positive breast cancer
- PMID: 8445420
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.454
Adjuvant randomized trials of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/tamoxifen and CMF chemotherapy versus tamoxifen in women with node-positive breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: We report two randomized trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in 747 patients < or = 65 years of age with histologically proven node-positive breast cancer.
Patients and methods: Patients were selected for the two trials on the basis of lymph node and hormone receptor status. The only stratification was based on the treating institution. In patients with a lower probability of recurrence (n = 276), a comparison between endocrine therapy (tamoxifen [Tam] 30 mg/d for 2 years) and chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF] intravenously [IV], six cycles every 4 weeks) was performed. In patients with a higher risk of recurrence (n = 471), a comparison between chemotherapy alone (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide [AC] i.v., eight cycles every 3 weeks) and the same chemotherapy plus Tam was made.
Results: Overall, we found that CMF and Tam are equally effective in a subgroup of patients with a relatively good prognosis (low-risk patients). However, in the subset of women < or = 49 years old, a significantly greater disease-free survival (DFS) rate (P = .01) and overall survival (OS) rate (P = .002) was observed following therapy with CMF compared with Tam. In patients > or = 50 years old, the opposite was found, and Tam appeared to be superior to CMF (DFS, P = .003; OSm P = .5). These results must be interpreted cautiously, since a post-hoc stratification of patients by age (< or = 49, > or = 50) was performed, and significantly more younger, low-risk patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy alone and more older patients to receive Tam alone. Among patients with a relatively poor prognosis (high-risk patients), a combination of AC plus Tam was equivalent to AC and, when women were analyzed by age, this was found to be true of patients < or = 49 years as well. However, the addition of Tam to AC in women age > or 50 years resulted in a statistically significantly higher DFS (P = .01) and a trend toward better OS compared with women who received AC alone.
Conclusion: Further trials are required to analyze the role of combined simultaneous or sequential chemoendocrine adjuvant treatment or each single therapy alone in defined risk-adapted subsets of node-negative and node-positive patients.
Similar articles
-
Randomized, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil with and without tamoxifen for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: treatment results of Intergroup Protocol INT-0102.J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8313-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.071. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16293862 Clinical Trial.
-
Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15.J Clin Oncol. 1990 Sep;8(9):1483-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.9.1483. J Clin Oncol. 1990. PMID: 2202791 Clinical Trial.
-
Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for axillary node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-23.J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):931-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.931. J Clin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11181655 Clinical Trial.
-
Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group.Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):833-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg260. Ann Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12796019 Review.
-
Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.Dan Med J. 2016 May;63(5):B5222. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27127018 Review.
Cited by
-
Hormonal therapy in breast cancer: a model disease for the personalization of cancer care.Mol Oncol. 2012 Apr;6(2):222-36. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Feb 24. Mol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22406404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postoperative endocrine therapy for invasive breast cancer.Cancer Treat Res. 2009;151:139-61. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75115-3_10. Cancer Treat Res. 2009. PMID: 19593511 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Tamoxifen and secondary tumours. An update.Drug Saf. 1997 Feb;16(2):104-17. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199716020-00003. Drug Saf. 1997. PMID: 9067122 Review.
-
Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer.Breast. 2009 Oct;18 Suppl 3(0 3):S122-30. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(09)70286-3. Breast. 2009. PMID: 19914530 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical