Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ten- to 18-year results
- PMID: 8448934
Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ten- to 18-year results
Abstract
In ten- to 18-year clinical and roentgenographic results of 46 cemented total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in 34 patients younger than 50 years of age, surviving primary implants achieved a mean Harris hip score of 93 points. Survivorship analysis revealed failure rates of 2% at seven years, 10% at ten years, and 12.7% at 12 years. Roentgenographic analysis demonstrated either no signs of failure or benign mechanical failure modes in 73% of cases. No correlation was found between the Charnley category or the diagnosis and the clinical or the roentgenographic assessments. Cemented THA in the young would appear to provide durable restoration of hip function, with a revision rate similar to that reported in the elderly. For reliable early detection of progressive mechanical failure before loss of bone stock occurs, annual roentgenographic examinations are advisable.
Similar articles
-
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19523892
-
Survivorship of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger.J Arthroplasty. 1992;7 Suppl:347-52. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(07)80023-4. J Arthroplasty. 1992. PMID: 1431915
-
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. PMID: 18829914
-
[Non-cemented reimplantation of failed hip prosthesis].Arch Putti Chir Organi Mov. 1991;39(1):37-47. Arch Putti Chir Organi Mov. 1991. PMID: 1842491 Review. Italian.
-
Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):12-21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992. PMID: 1728996 Review.
Cited by
-
Total hip arthroplasty: areview of advances, advantages and limitations.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):27-36. eCollection 2015. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015. PMID: 25784971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cemented total hip replacement in patients under 55 years.Acta Orthop. 2018 Apr;89(2):152-155. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1427320. Epub 2018 Jan 18. Acta Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29345170 Free PMC article.
-
The Exeter Universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10-17 years' followup.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Feb;466(2):324-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0049-7. Epub 2008 Jan 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008. PMID: 18196413 Free PMC article.
-
Uncemented and custom made hip prostheses in patients younger than 50 years.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 1996 Dec;6(4):255-259. doi: 10.1007/BF03380093. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 1996. PMID: 28315092 English.
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty When Utilised in Young Adults Is a Cost-Effective Procedure: A 10-Year and Lifetime Cost-Utility Analysis.Cureus. 2022 Feb 27;14(2):e22651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22651. eCollection 2022 Feb. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35371761 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources