Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population

Abstract

Norplant, the five-year subdermal contraceptive system, is the first implantable contraceptive method approved for general use in the United States. We describe the preliminary experiences of 246 U.S. women who accepted Norplant between April, 1991 and September, 1991. Norplant was well accepted among this diverse general population. Intensive counselling about side effects, especially menstrual changes, is crucial for patient satisfaction. Although 48% of acceptors experienced menstrual cycle changes and 70% experienced at least one side effect, phone calls and unscheduled visits for problems were infrequent. Adequate counselling about side effects obviates the need for a routine follow-up visit one month after insertion.

PIP: Between April and October 1991 in Baltimore, Maryland, family planning providers tried to follow 246 13-42 year old women at a clinic at the Francis Scott Key (FSK) Medical Center for 3 months who accepted the levonorgestrel-releasing implant Norplant to evaluate its acceptability and effectiveness among a high-risk population. 56% of the women were Black and 41% White. 69% were single. Most were interval gynecologic patients (109), but many were postabortion patients (97). The providers could only follow 108 women. Reasons for unscheduled visits were insertion site tenderness, amenorrhea, and removal. At 1 month, 70 % had at least 1 side effect. 48% had irregular bleeding 1-2 months after insertion. Other side effects included headache (49%), acne (24%), weight gain (22%), increased appetite (19%), and dizziness (18.5%). The 24-hour telephone hotline had only received 38 problem calls, all of which were from FSK Norplant patients. More than 50% of the calls were about menstruation concerns. Reasons for removal included pressure to receive Norplant, increased acne, headaches and prolonged bleeding, and postinsertion site problems. 1 woman became pregnant, but it occurred before insertion. She underwent an abortion and continued to use Norplant. 78% of the women considered Norplant to be excellent and 14% considered it to be good. 95% would recommend it to others. 69% reported convenience to be the best thing about Norplant and 22% said it was pregnancy prevention. Worst things were irregular bleeding (26%) and progestin-related side effects (e.g., headaches and weight gain) (19%). 35% did not consider anything to be bad about Norplant. 64% had at least some apprehension before insertion, the major reasons being fear of needles (48%) and of pain (37%). Prior to insertion, just 37% were worried about potential side effects. The providers thought that the routine follow-up visit at 1 month was not cost-effective and provided no specific clinical benefit. They advocated adequate counseling about side effects to take the place of the follow-up visit.