Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance
- PMID: 8454209
- PMCID: PMC1205352
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.681
Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance
Erratum in
- Genetics 1993 Jul;134(3):997
Abstract
For many organisms, meiotic double crossing over is less frequent than expected on the assumption that exchanges occur at random with respect to each other. This "interference," which can be almost total for nearby intervals, diminishes as the intervals in which the double crossovers are scored are moved farther apart. Most models for interference have assumed, at least implicitly, that the intensity of interference depends inversely on the physical distance separating the intervals. However, several observations suggest that interference depends on genetic distance (Morgans) rather than physical distance (base pairs or micrometers). Accordingly, we devise a model in which interference is related directly to genetic distance. Its central feature is that recombinational intermediates (C's) have two fates--they can be resolved with crossing over (Cx) or without (Co). We suppose that C's are distributed at random with respect to each other (no interference); interference results from constraints on the resolution of C's. The basic constraint is that each pair of neighboring Cx's must have between them a certain number of Co's. The required number of intervening Co's for a given organism or chromosome is estimated from the fraction of gene conversions that are unaccompanied by crossover of flanking markers. The predictions of the model are compared with data from Drosophila and Neurospora.
Similar articles
-
A test of a counting model for chiasma interference.Genetics. 1995 Mar;139(3):1201-9. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1201. Genetics. 1995. PMID: 7768433 Free PMC article.
-
Physical mapping of meiotic crossover events in a 200-kb region of Neurospora crassa linkage group I.Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1077-83. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1077. Genetics. 1993. PMID: 8104159 Free PMC article.
-
Chiasma interference and the distribution of exchanges in Drosophila melanogaster.Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993;58:543-52. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1993.058.01.061. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1993. PMID: 7956068 No abstract available.
-
Theoretical recombination processes incorporating interference effects.Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Oct;46(2):198-231. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1025. Theor Popul Biol. 1994. PMID: 7974280 Review.
-
Female Meiosis: Synapsis, Recombination, and Segregation in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2018 Mar;208(3):875-908. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300081. Genetics. 2018. PMID: 29487146 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Crossover interference and sex-specific genetic maps shape identical by descent sharing in close relatives.PLoS Genet. 2019 Dec 20;15(12):e1007979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007979. eCollection 2019 Dec. PLoS Genet. 2019. PMID: 31860654 Free PMC article.
-
Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway.Genetics. 2003 Apr;163(4):1273-86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1273. Genetics. 2003. PMID: 12702674 Free PMC article.
-
Maximal power tests for detecting defects in meiotic recombination.Genetics. 2002 Jul;161(3):1333-7. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1333. Genetics. 2002. PMID: 12136034 Free PMC article.
-
Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize.Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3915-25. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071514. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Plant Cell. 2009. PMID: 20040539 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.J Mol Evol. 2010 Dec;71(5-6):332-45. doi: 10.1007/s00239-010-9388-1. Epub 2010 Oct 2. J Mol Evol. 2010. PMID: 20890595
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases