Estimated gains in life expectancy with use of postmenopausal estrogen therapy: a decision analysis
- PMID: 8454973
Estimated gains in life expectancy with use of postmenopausal estrogen therapy: a decision analysis
Abstract
Background: Epidemiologic data are accumulating that suggest that postmenopausal estrogen therapy reduces the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD). Computer simulation by Markov analysis can be applied to current data to estimate the increase in life expectancy obtained from postmenopausal estrogen use and compare them with benefits from other therapies for CAD risk reduction. Decision-analysis techniques can also examine whether the benefits of unopposed estrogen regimens ever exceed those of combination therapy.
Methods: In our analysis, hypothetical cohorts of postmenopausal women age 50 and 65 years with intact uteri were assigned either to estrogen and progesterone therapy or unopposed estrogens. The subjects were also defined by risk category for CAD. Outcomes were measured in terms of life expectancy for treatment cohorts compared with identical untreated cohorts.
Results: Life expectancy benefits in combined therapy groups were found to be very substantial for all CAD risk categories. Cohorts who began therapy at age 50 years showed benefits ranging from 0.3 years of additional life for those at low risk of developing CAD to 2.3 years for those at high risk. Even though the addition of progestins may theoretically result in reduction of overall CAD benefits, impressive gains in life expectancy were still found even when a 40% reduction in estrogenic effect was considered. Overall, benefits were very favorable when compared with other accepted strategies for CAD risk reduction. Little additional benefit was found to justify use of unopposed estrogens given the potential added mortality from endometrial cancer.
Conclusions: Substantial increases in life expectancy may result from postmenopausal estrogen therapy. These may be equal to or possibly greater than benefits from other well-recognized risk-reduction strategies. Little advantage in additional life expectancy is found to justify use of unopposed estrogens.
Similar articles
-
Relative risks and benefits of long-term estrogen replacement therapy: a decision analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):161-6. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8290175
-
Comparative cardiovascular effects of different progestins in menopause.Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;46(5):248-56. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2001. PMID: 11720197 Review.
-
Effects of hormone replacement therapy.Int J Fertil. 1992;37 Suppl 2:98-103. Int J Fertil. 1992. PMID: 1354665 Review.
-
Epidemiologic aspects of exogenous progestagens in relation to their role in pathogenesis of human breast cancer.Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991;125 Suppl 1:13-26. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1991. PMID: 1801500 Review.
-
Hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy after prophylactic oophorectomy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations: a decision analysis.J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1045-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.090. Epub 2004 Feb 23. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 14981106
Cited by
-
The meaning of life expectancy: what is a clinically significant gain?J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Dec;9(12):702-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599016. J Gen Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7876956 No abstract available.
-
Effect of physician gender on the prescription of estrogen replacement therapy.J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Apr;11(4):197-203. doi: 10.1007/BF02642475. J Gen Intern Med. 1996. PMID: 8744876
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous