Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):624-30.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.624.

Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care

B Hurwitz et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of centrally organised prompting for coordinating community care of non-insulin dependent diabetic patients.

Design: Randomised single centre trial. Patients allocated to prompted care in the community or to continued attendance at hospital diabetic clinic (controls). Median follow up two years.

Setting: Two hospital outpatient clinics, 38 general practices, and 11 optometrists in the catchment area of a district general hospital in Islington.

Patients: 181 patients attending hospital outpatient clinics.

Null hypothesis: There is no difference in process of medical care measures and medical outcome between prompted community care and hospital clinic care.

Results: 14 hospital patients failed to receive a single review in the clinic as compared with three patients in the prompted group (chi 2 = 6.1, df = 1; p = 0.013). Follow up for retinal screening was better in prompted patients than in controls; two prompted patients defaulted as against 12 controls (chi 2 = 6.9, df = 1; p = 0.008). Three measures per patient yearly were more frequent in prompted patients: tests for albuminuria (median 3.0 v 2.3; p = 0.03), plasma glucose estimations (3.1 v 2.5; p = 0.003), and glycated haemoglobin estimations (2.4 v 0.9; p < 0.001). Continuity of care was better in the prompted group (3.2 v 2.2 reviews by each doctor seen; p < 0.001). The study ended with no significant differences between the groups in last recorded random plasma glucose concentration, glycated haemoglobin value, numbers admitted to hospital for a diabetes related reason, and number of deaths. Questionnaires revealed a high level of patient, general practitioner, and optometrist satisfaction.

Conclusions: Six monthly prompting of non-insulin treated diabetic patients for care by inner city general practitioners and by optometrists is effective and acceptable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Diabetic care in general practice.
    Kinmonth AL. Kinmonth AL. BMJ. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):599-600. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.599. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8461806 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):728-30 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Sep 22;289(6447):726-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Nov 9;291(6505):1330-2 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jun 20;294(6587):1590-2 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1989 Nov 11;299(6709):1198-201 - PubMed

Publication types