Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Mar 6;306(6878):630-4.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6878.630.

Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care?

Affiliations

Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care?

M Pringle et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess patient, doctor, practice, and process of care variables for their effect on glycaemic control in diabetes mellitus, and to quantify their relative effects.

Design: Search of general practice medical records, patient questionnaires and examination, doctor questionnaire, videotaping and analysis of consultations, and practice questionnaire.

Setting: 12 practices with 32 participating general practitioners in Nottinghamshire.

Subjects: 318 patients randomly selected from those with diabetes in each practice, 10 for each participating doctor.

Main outcome measure: Glycaemic control as measured by random glycated haemoglobin A1c estimation (random haemoglobin A1 measurement).

Results: Glycaemic control was significantly related to the disease process as measured by years since diagnosis, treatment group, and number of diabetes related clinical events. Females had significantly worse control than males. Other patient factors, such as age, social class, lifestyle, attitudes, satisfaction, and knowledge, had no association with glycaemic control. Of all the doctor factors examined, only doctors who professed a special interest in diabetes achieved significantly better glycaemic control. Bigger and better equipped practices and those with a diabetic miniclinic had patients with significantly better glycaemic control, as did those with access to dietetic advice. Patients attending hospital clinics had worse glycaemic control, but this seemed to be attributable to the case mix and practice characteristics. Shared care did not contribute to the multiple linear regression model.

Conclusion: Glycaemic control among diabetic patients in the community is related to such factors as treatment group, sex, and years since diagnosis; it is also related to the organisation and process of care. The findings support concentrating diabetic care on partners with special interests in diabetes in well equipped practices with adequate dietetic support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Diabetic care in general practice.
    Barratt J. Barratt J. BMJ. 1993 Apr 24;306(6885):1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6885.1123. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8338583 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Diabetic care in general practice.
    Soler M, Jones RB. Soler M, et al. BMJ. 1993 Apr 24;306(6885):1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6885.1123-a. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8495163 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Diabet Med. 1984 Sep;1(3):213-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jul 5;293(6538):20-2 - PubMed
    1. Diabet Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):539-43 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1988 Jul 16;297(6642):187-9 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):929-31 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances