Comparative tolerability profiles of thrombolytic agents. A review
- PMID: 8471185
- DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199308010-00004
Comparative tolerability profiles of thrombolytic agents. A review
Abstract
The 4 widely available thrombolytic agents, alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC; anistreplase), streptokinase and urokinase have revolutionised the treatment of acute myocardial infarction and are also effective in treating pulmonary embolism and peripheral arterial thrombosis. Therapeutic efficacy of the agents appears to be similar. Choice of a thrombolytic agent depends more on patient characteristics, availability and familiarity with the drug, cost and differences in tolerability. While overall thrombolytic therapy is relatively safe, these 4 agents differ in their tolerability profiles. Streptokinase has the lowest cerebral haemorrhage rate, anistreplase an intermediate and alteplase the highest rate. The incidence of total stroke is also higher with alteplase and anistreplase than with streptokinase, translating to an actual difference in patient risk of 4 extra strokes per 1000 patients treated. Risk of major bleeding is dependent on predisposing factors and seems to be similar with each agent. The incidence of hypotension with alteplase (4.3% in ISIS-3) is less than with streptokinase or anistreplase (6.8 and 7.2%, respectively in ISIS-3). The incidence of major anaphylactic reactions with streptokinase and anistreplase is low (< 1%). Urokinase and alteplase may be preferred for readministration of thrombolytic therapy and anistreplase is the agent of choice where rapid completion of therapy is desirable. The various agents may have different tolerability profiles with different adjunctive therapies and further data are therefore required.
Similar articles
-
New developments in thrombolytic therapy.Adv Exp Med Biol. 1990;281:333-54. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1990. PMID: 2129372 Review.
-
Comparative safety of thrombolytic agents.Am J Cardiol. 1991 Dec 5;68(16):30E-37E. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90303-3. Am J Cardiol. 1991. PMID: 1746450 Review.
-
Importance of the pharmacological profile of thrombolytic agents in clinical practice.Am J Cardiol. 1991 Dec 5;68(16):3E-7E. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90298-y. Am J Cardiol. 1991. PMID: 1746449 Review.
-
Thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation. 1990 Sep;82(3 Suppl):II96-109. Circulation. 1990. PMID: 2118432 Review.
-
Use of thrombolytic drugs in non-coronary disorders.Drugs. 1989 Nov;38(5):801-21. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938050-00006. Drugs. 1989. PMID: 2689138 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmacoeconomic aspects of treatment of acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic agents.Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Mar;3(3):192-204. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303030-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993. PMID: 10172049 Review.
-
Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Nov;10(5):441-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996. PMID: 10163626 Review. No abstract available.
-
Mental Dullness after thrombolytic therapy.Postgrad Med J. 1997 Jun;73(860):347-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.73.860.347. Postgrad Med J. 1997. PMID: 9246336 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
19th Meeting of the European Neurological Society. Milan, Italy, 5-9 June 1999. Abstracts.J Neurol. 1999 Jun;246 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I1-196. doi: 10.1007/BF03160586. J Neurol. 1999. PMID: 10450555 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Streptokinase. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in the management of acute myocardial infarction.Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Sep;10(3):281-310. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610030-00009. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996. PMID: 10163575 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources