The efficacy and efficiency of an in-vitro fertilization programme including embryo cryopreservation: a cohort study
- PMID: 8473429
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138032
The efficacy and efficiency of an in-vitro fertilization programme including embryo cryopreservation: a cohort study
Abstract
A cohort of 485 couples starting their first in-vitro fertilization (IVF) attempt between January, 1989 and February, 1991 inclusive, were followed until June 1, 1992. A total of 1086 treatment cycles were initiated (mean 2.2, range 1-6). Of these, 235 (21.8%) cycles were cancelled, giving a total of 851 embryo replacements (mean 1.7, range 1-5). After IVF treatment, 189 women have either delivered or have an ongoing pregnancy in the second or third trimester. This gives a baby take-home rate of 17.4% per started cycle and 22.2% per embryo replacement. For 91 (18.6%) of the couples, the treatment was abandoned prior to completion of the three scheduled IVF attempts and 57 (11.7%) of these had no completed IVF cycles. In the group of couples with reduced sperm quality, the delivery rate was significantly lower than that of the other groups. A total of 193 women had embryos cryopreserved in at least one IVF cycle; 124 of these women started a frozen embryo replacement cycle and 88 had at least one cycle with replacement of frozen/thawed embryos, resulting in 25 deliveries/ongoing pregnancies. Due to the Norwegian law on assisted procreation 65 (33.7%) of the women have had their frozen embryos thawed and discarded after 12 months of storage. The cryopreservation programme, with the limitations of the Norwegian law, gives a 5.2% increase in the baby take-home rate for women entering the IVF programme, an increase of 13.2% in the number of ongoing pregnancies/deliveries and an 11.6% increase in number of children/viable fetuses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
[Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Oct 28;88(39):2755-8. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 19080449 Chinese.
-
The success rate in a Swedish in-vitro fertilization unit: a cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Jul;74(6):446-50. doi: 10.3109/00016349509024407. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995. PMID: 7604688
-
The contribution of embryo cryopreservation to in-vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer: 8 years experience.Hum Reprod. 1994 Jan;9(1):103-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138296. Hum Reprod. 1994. PMID: 8195330
-
Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates.Fertil Steril. 2014 Jul;102(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 24890275 Review.
-
Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Apr 5;113 Suppl 1:S24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.006. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. PMID: 15041126 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of laser-assisted hatching and exposure time to vitrification solution on mouse embryo development.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Dec;44(4):193-200. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2017.44.4.193. Epub 2017 Dec 31. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017. PMID: 29376016 Free PMC article.
-
Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one.Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Jul 6;1:11. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0023-4. eCollection 2016. Contracept Reprod Med. 2016. PMID: 29201400 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cryopreservation of embryos: medical, ethical, and legal issues.J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Nov;13(10):756-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02066493. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996. PMID: 8986584 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources