Coagulation studies in the preeclamptic parturient: a survey
- PMID: 8476626
- DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90134-z
Coagulation studies in the preeclamptic parturient: a survey
Abstract
Study objective: To delineate current practice with regard to how coagulation status is evaluated before induction of regional anesthesia in the preeclamptic parturient, with the goal of defining appropriate testing.
Design: A confidential survey was mailed to the chairmen of all 113 anesthesiology residency training programs in the United States listed in the American Medical Association's American Medical Graduation Education guide, to be passed on to the director of obstetric anesthesia.
Setting: Academic institutions providing obstetric anesthesia services in the United States.
Interventions: Following the original study, there was no additional follow-up or intervention.
Measurements and main results: The 21-question survey explored institutional characteristics such as the number of deliveries, the use of regional anesthesia, and the laboratory tests required prior to placement of a regional anesthetic in the mildly or severely preeclamptic parturient under two degrees of operative urgency. In the 74 programs entered into the analysis, we found that regional anesthesia was used in the majority of cesarean sections and more than half of the vaginal deliveries. In an urgent situation, most of the programs required no test of coagulation status in the mild preeclamptic parturient and only a platelet count in the severe preeclamptic parturient.
Conclusions: In the majority of academic programs in the United States, we found that the evaluation of coagulation status in the preeclamptic parturient was based primarily on a platelet count. A review of the literature supports this pattern of testing.
Similar articles
-
Continuous spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a parturient with severe preeclampsia.J Clin Anesth. 1998 Sep;10(6):510-3. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00066-x. J Clin Anesth. 1998. PMID: 9793818
-
Practice patterns of anesthesiologists regarding situations in obstetric anesthesia where clinical management is controversial.Anesth Analg. 1996 Oct;83(4):735-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199610000-00013. Anesth Analg. 1996. PMID: 8831312
-
Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: a retrospective survey.Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1276-82. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199905000-00009. Anesthesiology. 1999. PMID: 10319773
-
Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia: proponent position.Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2002;53(4):305-10. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2002. PMID: 12503355 Review. No abstract available.
-
Laboratory management of the bleeding patient.Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Spring;16(2):111-4. Clin Lab Sci. 2003. PMID: 12757191 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Role of Thromboelastography Versus Coagulation Screen as a Safety Predictor in Pre-eclampsia/Eclampsia Patients Undergoing Lower-Segment Caesarean Section in Regional Anaesthesia.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):340-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0906-y. Epub 2016 Jun 22. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016. PMID: 27651627 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating hemostatic thresholds for neuraxial anesthesia in adults with hemorrhagic disorders and tendencies: A scoping review.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 May 4;5(4):e12491. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12491. eCollection 2021 May. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021. PMID: 33977207 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical