Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;66(3):207-13.
doi: 10.1007/BF00235095.

Body position affects the power spectrum of heart rate variability during dynamic exercise

Affiliations

Body position affects the power spectrum of heart rate variability during dynamic exercise

R Perini et al. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993.

Abstract

The power spectrum analysis of R-R interval variability (RRV) has been estimated by means of an autoregressive method in six men in supine (S) and sitting (C) postures at rest and during steady-state cycle exercise at about 14%, 28%, 45%, 67% of the maximal oxygen consumption (% VO2max). The total power of RRV decreased exponentially as a function of exercise intensity in a similar way in both postures. Three components were recognized in the power spectra: firstly, a high frequency peak (HF), an expression of respiratory arrhythmia, the central frequency (fcentral) of which increased in both S and C from a resting value of about 0.26 Hz to 0.42 Hz at 67% VO2max; secondly, a low frequency peak (LF) related to arterial pressure control, the fcentral of which remained constant at 0.1 Hz in C, whereas in S above 28% VO2max decreased to 0.07 Hz; and thirdly, a very low frequency component (VLF; less than 0.05 Hz, no fcentral). The power of the three components (as a percentage of the total power) depended on the body posture and the metabolic demand. HF% at rest was 30.3 (SEM 6.6) % in S and 5.0 (SEM 0.8) % in C. During exercise HF% decreased by about 30% in S and increased to 19.7 (SEM 5.5) % at 28% VO2max in C. LF% was lower in S than in C at rest [31.6 (SEM 5.7) % vs 44.9 (SEM 6.4) %; P < 0.05], remaining constant up to 28% VO2max.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1980 Sep;62(3):528-34 - PubMed
    1. Int J Biomed Comput. 1985 May;16(3-4):201-15 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Res. 1990 Dec;24(12):969-81 - PubMed
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Feb;81(2):157-63 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1981 Jul 10;213(4504):220-2 - PubMed

Publication types