Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Feb;14(2):61-8.
doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(93)90032-f.

Current perspectives on anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse

Affiliations
Review

Current perspectives on anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse

S E Lukas. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1993 Feb.

Abstract

For the past 40 years anabolic-androgenic steroids have been used by a wide variety of athletes with the hope of improving their training, endurance and performance. Proponents of their use claim that the drugs increase muscle strength and mass, endurance, decrease recovery time between workouts and improve physique. Critics claim that these beneficial effects are due primarily to expectancy and other factors associated with training; many doctors also claim that their use is actually quite dangerous. Regardless of their efficacy, the use and abuse of anabolic-androgenic steroids has escalated such that in 1990 the US Congress enacted the Anabolic Steroids Control Act requiring that anabolic steroids be added to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act. This action placed compounds such as testosterone cipionate and nandrolone decanoate in the company of various opioid drugs, amphetamines and barbiturates. As chair of the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics' Committee on Substance Abuse, Scott Lukas advocates continued research on the effectiveness, toxicity and natural history of anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms