Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Apr;7(2):96-103.
doi: 10.1016/s0887-7963(93)70128-5.

Challenges in transfusion microbiology

Affiliations
Review

Challenges in transfusion microbiology

J A Barbara. Transfus Med Rev. 1993 Apr.

Abstract

PIP: Transfusion microbiology must minimize the risks of transfusion transmitted infection (TTI) in a cost-effective and efficient manner. The wide range of transmissible microbial agents exhibits different relative risks in different circumstances; therefore, the same safety rules are not always applicable. TTIs can also exist as asymptomatic diseases in their hosts, so donors must be screened for high-risk behavior. Then blood must be screened by detecting antibodies to infectious agents. Since antibody reactivity is difficult to confirm, and cross-reactive or nonspecific effects are possible, a reactive sample can be tested by a range of assays, each based on a different immunoassay principle, or by a supplementary assay. Despite the advanced nature of these tests, problems of indeterminate donors remain, and a compromise must be made between the sensitivity and specificity of screening assays; maximum sensitivity protects transfusion recipients, but specificity prevents wasting blood or making false reports about donor health. An ideal screening assay would have maximum sensitivity, optimal specificity, simplicity, objectivity, standard format, rapid processing time, safety of reagents, and economy. Assay users must chose the best combination of available characteristics for their particular situation. For example, a French study found that 30% of seronegative, but HIV-infectious, donors are anti-HBc positive; this test would be too specific, however, in a country where hepatitis B is common. Combined assays are being used to screen for anti-HIV-1 and -2 and anti-human T-cell lymphotropic virus-I and -II; this should save time and money. Screening donors selectively (for example, Latin American migrants to North America for Trypanosoma cruzi) may protect previously unexposed populations. In some countries, transmission of HIV via seronegative blood is a problem, and HIV antigen screening and confirmation of reactivity by neutralization should occur as soon as reagents become less expensive. As test methodology continues to move through rapid developmental "generations," the development of sensitive techniques to detect nucleic acids holds promise. Several problems will remain to be solved including cost cross-contamination and carry-over in automated sampling systems, and operational and clerical errors. While there are methods to inactivate viruses in plasma pools, inactivation must incur a minimal loss of biological activity. All of these challenges are exacerbated in developing countries by a lack of resources. As physicians become knowledgeable about when to use transfusion and when to use an alternative method, such as blood salvage, refusing transfusion will be more risky than contracting a TTI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources