Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Mar;52(3):199-204.
doi: 10.1007/BF00298718.

Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro

Affiliations

Geometric variables from DXA of the radius predict forearm fracture load in vitro

E R Myers et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Mar.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the cross-sectional geometry of the radius in female and male cadaveric specimens using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), to measure the accuracy of this technique compared with a digitizing procedure, and to measure the correlation between these DXA-based geometric variables and the load required to produce a forearm fracture. Paired intact forearms were scanned at a distal site and at a site approximately 30% of the forearm length from the distal end. The cross-sectional area and the moments of inertia of two sections at 10 and 30% of the forearm length were computed from the X-ray attenuation data. One member of each pair was then sectioned at the 30% location, which is mostly cortical bone, and the section was traced on a digitizing pad. The other forearm was loaded to failure in a servohydraulic materials test system. The DXA-based area and moment of inertia at 30% correlated significantly with the digitized results (r2 = 0.93 for area; r2 = 0.95 for moment; P < 0.001). The conventional bone mineral density from DXA did not associate significantly with failure load, but the minimum moment of inertia and the cross-sectional area at 10% correlated in a strong and significant manner with the forearm fracture force (r2 = 0.67 for area; r2 = 0.66 for moment; P < 0.001). The determination of radial bone cross-sectional geometry, therefore, should have better discriminatory capabilities than bone mineral density in studies of bone fragility and fracture risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Neth J Med. 1990 Aug;37(1-2):53-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1000-11 - PubMed
    1. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Oct;55(5):573-5 - PubMed
    1. Bone. 1989;10 (6):465-70 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1991 Nov;32(11):2101-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources