Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Mar;52(3):212-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF00298721.

Bone mineral density in weight lifters

Affiliations

Bone mineral density in weight lifters

M K Karlsson et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Mar.

Abstract

The effect of intense physical training on the bone mineral content (BMC) and soft tissue composition, and the development of these values after cessation of the active career, was studied in 40 nationally or internationally ranked male weight lifters. Nineteen were active and 21 had retired from competition sports. Fifty-two age- and sex-matched nonweight lifters served as controls. The bone mineral density (BMD) in total body, spine, hip, and proximal tibial metaphysis was measured with a Lunar Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) apparatus and the BMD of the distal forearm was measured with single photon absorptiometry (SPA). Seventeen of the lifters had been measured earlier with SPA in the forearm and 23 in the tibial condyle during their active career in 1975. The BMD was significantly higher in the weight lifters compared with the controls (10% in the total body P < 0.001, 12% in the trochanteric region P < 0.001, and 13% in the lumbar spine P < 0.001). All measured regions except the head showed significant higher bone mass in the weight lifters compared with the controls. In older lifters, the difference from the controls seemed to increase in total body and lumbar vertebrae (BMD), but remained unchanged in the hip. Significant correlation was found between the SPA measurements in 1975 and the corresponding measurements 15 years later in both the forearm (r = 0.51, P < 0.05 at the 1-cm level and r = 0.87, P < 0.001 at the 6-cm level) and in the tibial condyle (r = 0.61, P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bone Miner. 1986 Apr;1(2):115-25 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Jun;108(6):824-8 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Sep;68(7):1090-3 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;77:179-82 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1980 Sep 5;244(10):1107-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources