Threshold variation in automated perimetry
- PMID: 8484168
- DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(93)90065-f
Threshold variation in automated perimetry
Abstract
A physiologic fluctuation in threshold levels exists in automated perimetry, which is greater in glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients than in normal subjects. Fluctuation increases with greater eccentricity from fixation and in areas of reduced retinal sensitivity. Other factors related to automated perimetry testing potentially may influence threshold fluctuation including: a learning effect, reliability, pupil size, age, and the mode of stimulus presentation. Statistical software may aid in analyzing both the single field and the changes between successive fields. However, statistical programs cannot replace physician judgment, and all factors that may influence threshold levels should be considered when interpreting automated visual fields.
Similar articles
-
Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results.Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Jan;113(1):70-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100010072023. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995. PMID: 7826296
-
High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Mar 15;113(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71584-3. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992. PMID: 1543225
-
The effect of treatment on the results of high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma.Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Aug;72(4):423-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02789.x. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994. PMID: 7825405
-
Diagnostic value of short-wavelength automated perimetry.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr;7(2):54-8. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199604000-00010. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996. PMID: 10163323 Review.
-
[Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results].Ophthalmologe. 2013 Feb;110(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2690-0. Ophthalmologe. 2013. PMID: 23392836 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Mapping the Contrast Sensitivity of the Visual Field With Bayesian Adaptive qVFM.Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 7;14:665. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00665. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32733188 Free PMC article.
-
The Frontloading Fields Study: The Impact of False Positives and Seeding Point Errors on Visual Field Reliability When Using SITA-Faster.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):20. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.20. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 35142783 Free PMC article.
-
Gaze tracker parameters have little association with visual field metrics of intrasession frontloaded SITA-Faster 24-2 visual field results.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Sep;42(5):973-985. doi: 10.1111/opo.13006. Epub 2022 May 22. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022. PMID: 35598152 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising the Structure-Function Relationship at the Locus of Deficit in Retinal Disease.Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 9;13:306. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00306. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31024235 Free PMC article.
-
The volume of tumor mass and visual field defect in patients with pituitary macroadenoma.Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;25(1):37-41. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.1.37. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21350693 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources