Economic benefits of parasite control in cattle
- PMID: 8484208
- DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90056-s
Economic benefits of parasite control in cattle
Abstract
The economic losses often associated with parasitism in cattle are universally accepted. The degree of economic significance related to these losses, the burdens of parasites required to cause such losses, and the specific control measures needed to avoid these losses are, however, topics of serious debate and outright disagreement among parasitologists and veterinarians. This is because most cattle have parasite burdens that are truly subclinical, with no obvious signs of parasitism but significant losses in potential production. These losses are often very insidious in nature and often difficult to prove statistically in a consistent manner. This discussion focuses on the need to: (1) define the benefits related to parasite control in cattle; (2) develop clear and effective parasite control recommendations that will allow the producer to realize these benefits; (3) effectively transfer this information to the cattleman.
Similar articles
-
Economics of deworming beef cattle.Vet Parasitol. 1988 Feb;27(1-2):67-71. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90062-3. Vet Parasitol. 1988. PMID: 3363844
-
A systematic review on modelling approaches for economic losses studies caused by parasites and their associated diseases in cattle.Parasitology. 2019 Feb;146(2):129-141. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018001282. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Parasitology. 2019. PMID: 30068403
-
[Parasitic diseases--a current problem area in intensive pasture management].Angew Parasitol. 1989 Feb;30(1):3-9. Angew Parasitol. 1989. PMID: 2658690 Review. German.
-
The economics of parasite control: obstacles to creating reliable models.Vet Parasitol. 1997 Nov;72(3-4):437-44; discussion 444-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00109-x. Vet Parasitol. 1997. PMID: 9460210 Review.
-
Pathophysiology of infection with Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle.Vet Parasitol. 1993 Feb;46(1-4):143-58. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90055-r. Vet Parasitol. 1993. PMID: 8484207 Review.
Cited by
-
Regional heterogeneity and unexpectedly high abundance of Cooperia punctata in beef cattle at a northern latitude revealed by ITS-2 rDNA nemabiome metabarcoding.Parasit Vectors. 2022 Jan 6;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05137-y. Parasit Vectors. 2022. PMID: 34991707 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the Micro-Agar Larval Development Test to Differentiate Resistant and Susceptible Cooperia spp. Isolates in Cattle Within the Context of Parasite Population Replacement.Pathogens. 2024 Oct 31;13(11):952. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13110952. Pathogens. 2024. PMID: 39599505 Free PMC article.
-
Case-control study on factors associated with a decreased milk yield and a depressed health status of dairy herds in northern Germany.BMC Vet Res. 2019 Dec 5;15(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2190-4. BMC Vet Res. 2019. PMID: 31805933 Free PMC article.
-
Farmer Behavior and Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Ruminant Livestock-Uptake of Sustainable Control Approaches.Front Vet Sci. 2018 Oct 16;5:255. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00255. eCollection 2018. Front Vet Sci. 2018. PMID: 30386785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What's in your next-generation sequence data? An exploration of unmapped DNA and RNA sequence reads from the bovine reference individual.BMC Genomics. 2015 Dec 29;16:1114. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2313-7. BMC Genomics. 2015. PMID: 26714747 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources