Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 May;147(5):1126-31.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1126.

Cellular and biochemical analysis of induced sputum from asthmatic and from healthy subjects

Affiliations

Cellular and biochemical analysis of induced sputum from asthmatic and from healthy subjects

J V Fahy et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 May.

Abstract

To determine the feasibility of cellular and biochemical analysis of sputum induced after inhalation of hypertonic (3%) saline, we analyzed sputum induced in 10 healthy and in 18 asthmatic subjects. We also analyzed saliva samples from all subjects. The entire sputum sample and the saliva sample were reduced using dithiothreitol, and cell counts and differentials were determined. Biochemical analysis was performed on sputum and saliva supernatants obtained after centrifugation. We found that induced sputum from asthmatic subjects had a higher percentage of eosinophils [8.1 +/- 3.43 (mean +/- SEM) versus 0.03 +/- 0.02%, p < 0.009] (after excluding squamous cells) and also had higher levels of albumin (232.3 +/- 54.8 versus 79.5 +/- 9.7 micrograms/ml, p < 0.02), fibrinogen (44.2 +/- 11.6 versus 11.9 +/- 2.5 micrograms/ml, p < 0.008) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) (142.6 +/- 34.2 versus 26.1 +/- 4.7 ng/ml, p < 0.006) but not of histamine or tryptase. In saliva, squamous cells made up more than 99% of the cells in both groups, and protein concentrations were not significantly different. We conclude that cellular and biochemical analysis of induced sputum is feasible in healthy and in asthmatic subjects and that it reveals differences similar to those reported from analyses of bronchial lavage fluid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms