Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey
- PMID: 8485677
- PMCID: PMC1485568
Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the current status of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) in Canadian teaching and nonteaching hospitals, to review the medical and nursing standards of practice for EFM and to determine the availability of EFM educational programs.
Design: National survey in 1989.
Participants: The directors of nursing at the 737 hospitals providing obstetric care were sent a questionnaire and asked to have it completed by the most appropriate staff member. The response rate was 80.5% (593/737); 44 hospitals did not have deliveries in 1988 and were excluded. The remaining hospitals varied in size from 8 to 1800 (mean 162.1) beds and had 1 to 7500 (mean 617.1) births in 1988; 18.8% were teaching hospitals.
Results: Of the 549 hospitals 419 (76.3%) reported having at least 1 monitor (range 1 to 30; mean 2.6); the mean number of monitors per hospital was higher in the teaching hospitals than in the nonteaching hospitals (6.2 v. 1.7). Manitoba had the lowest mean number of monitors per hospital (1.1) and Ontario the highest (3.7). In 71.8% of the hospitals with monitors almost all of the obstetric patients were monitored at some point during labour. However, 21.6% of the hospitals with monitors had no policy on EFM practice. The availability of EFM educational programs for physicians and nurses varied according to hospital size, type and region.
Conclusions: Most Canadian hospitals providing obstetric services have electronic fetal monitors and use them frequently. Although substantial research has questioned the benefits of EFM, further definitive research is required. In the meantime, a national committee should be established to develop multidisciplinary guidelines for intrapartum fetal assessment.
Similar articles
-
The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.Ir Med J. 2007 Feb;100(2):360-2. Ir Med J. 2007. PMID: 17432809
-
Factors influencing the delivery of abortion services in Ontario: a descriptive study.Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):134-8. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9635262
-
A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;81(6):899-907. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8497353 Clinical Trial.
-
Whither electronic fetal monitoring?Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;76(6):1130-4. Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2234724 Review.
-
Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):656-66. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000230533.62760.ef. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16946228 Review.
Cited by
-
Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.CMAJ. 2002 Sep 3;167(5):469-74. CMAJ. 2002. PMID: 12240812 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Rethinking risk.Can Fam Physician. 1994 Jul;40:1239-42, 1244, 1246-51. Can Fam Physician. 1994. PMID: 8086835 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources