Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Mar-Apr;16(2):72-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF02602981.

Percutaneous thrombectomy of the acutely thrombosed dialysis graft: in vitro evaluation of four devices

Affiliations

Percutaneous thrombectomy of the acutely thrombosed dialysis graft: in vitro evaluation of four devices

T Schmitz-Rode et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1993 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Percutaneous recanalization of completely thrombosed hemodialysis grafts was simulated in a flow model. Thrombus removal was performed by 1) a Trac-Wright catheter; 2) an ultrasound-driven, oscillating probe aspiration thrombectomy (US-OAT) device; 3) an electric motor-driven oscillating probe aspiration thrombectomy (EM-OAT) device; and 4) a rotating spiral aspiration thrombectomy (RAT) device. All devices were able to restore a continuous lumen of the shunt model within 1-5 min, but residual layers of wall-adherent thrombi remained attached, particularly to the inner curvature of the shunt loop. Clot removal rate was 95% for the Trac-Wright catheter, 73% for the US-OAT device, 68% for the EM-OAT device (straight tip catheter), 88% for the EM-OAT device (angulated tip catheter), and 51% for the RAT device. Effluent particle rates for particles > 100 microns were 3.6% for the Trac-Wright catheter, 0.6% for US-OAT, and less than 0.1% for the other devices. Compared with the Trac-Wright catheter, the balance of clot-removing efficiency and creation of effluent particles favored the electric oscillating device with the angulated tip catheter, which had a slightly reduced, but still efficient, clot-removing capability and produced almost no effluent particles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1991 Jan 4;116(1):1-6 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Jul;149(1):177-81 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1987 Sep;164(3):693-7 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 1991 Jun;26(6):557-63 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991 Mar-Apr;14(2):98-101 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources