Stereoscopic cooperation between the fovea of one eye and the periphery of the other eye at large disparities. Implications for anomalous retinal correspondence in strabismus

Abstract

In normal human observers we searched for the largest amount of visual disparity that can still provide depth information; we compared (1) crossed and uncrossed disparities and (2) symmetrical and asymmetrical locations of disparate stimuli. A pair of 3 degrees discs projected for 100 ms served as targets. Symmetrical stimuli were projected on temporal or nasal retinal loci in both eyes; asymmetrical stimuli were projected on the fovea of one eye and on the nasal or temporal periphery of the other eye. Thresholds were determined using a two-alternative forced choice procedure. Subjects had to distinguish binocular disparate images from monocular double images of identical angular separation. Among six subjects, crossed disparities were recognized by one up to 6 degrees, by three up to 9 degrees, by one up to 18 degrees, and by one up to 21 degrees. Uncrossed disparities were recognized by two at 3 degrees, by two up to 6 degrees and by two up to 9 degrees. Hence, crossed disparities could be recognized up to higher angles than uncrossed. No consistent difference was found between symmetrical and asymmetrical stimuli. Stimuli with crossed disparity appeared smaller and with uncrossed disparity larger than monocular stimuli of the same objective size, suggesting that the size-constancy mechanism operates when disparity stimuli are presented as briefly as 100 ms, i.e., without simultaneous vergence eye movements. We speculate that the far-reaching interocular connections demonstrated in normal subjects might also be utilized in the case of strabismus: these interocular connections could form the basis for anomalous retinal correspondence.