Behavior in light-dark cycles of Drosophila mutants that are arrhythmic, blind, or both
- PMID: 8490212
- DOI: 10.1177/074873049300800106
Behavior in light-dark cycles of Drosophila mutants that are arrhythmic, blind, or both
Abstract
Certain of the rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster lead to arrhythmic locomotor activity (and aperiodic eclosion) in constant conditions. In light-dark (LD) cycles, however, such mutants exhibit clear fluctuations between high levels of activity when the lights are on and much lower ones when they are off. Our data, in contrast to some previous conclusions, strongly suggest that period0 (per0) adults are, in LD conditions, merely being "forced" into exhibiting periodic behavior. These experiments involved application of 8-, 12-, 16-, and 24-hr LD cycles, in which the arrhythmic mutant could have any of these periodicities imposed upon it, whereas wild-type flies tended to exhibit periods of about 24 hr in cycling conditions whose T values were > 8 hr different from 24. In phase-shift experiments, it was found that Drosophila expressing genotypes associated with rhythmicity achieved a 5-hr advance over a 2-day period following an advanced lights-on; per0 adults altered the phase of their locomotor peaks more rapidly. Against a background of the fact that eyeless or blind flies exhibit normal entrainment, it was hypothesized that double-mutant flies--carrying such visual mutations and per0 as well--should not synchronize to LD cycles, if the forced rhythms seen in the latter single-mutant type are mediated solely by light input through the external photoreceptors. Since an appreciable proportion of the double mutants did synchronize (to LD 12:12), it is thus suggested that the visual cues involved in forcing rhythmicity could be input through the same extraocular photoreceptors that, in general, subserve the fly's rhythm system.
Similar articles
-
An ultrashort clock mutation at the period locus of Drosophila melanogaster that reveals some new features of the fly's circadian system.J Biol Rhythms. 1994 Winter;9(3-4):189-216. doi: 10.1177/074873049400900303. J Biol Rhythms. 1994. PMID: 7772790
-
The disconnected visual system mutations in Drosophila melanogaster drastically disrupt circadian rhythms.J Biol Rhythms. 1989 Spring;4(1):1-27. doi: 10.1177/074873048900400101. J Biol Rhythms. 1989. PMID: 2519577
-
The effects of period mutations and light on the activity rhythms of Drosophila melanogaster.J Biol Rhythms. 1995 Sep;10(3):267-80. doi: 10.1177/074873049501000309. J Biol Rhythms. 1995. PMID: 7488764
-
Genetic analysis of Drosophila circadian behavior in seminatural conditions.Methods Enzymol. 2015;551:121-33. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 29. Methods Enzymol. 2015. PMID: 25662454 Review.
-
dFRAME: A Video Recording-Based Analytical Method for Studying Feeding Rhythm in Drosophila.Front Genet. 2021 Oct 15;12:763200. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.763200. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2021. PMID: 34721548 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dispensable, redundant, complementary, and cooperative roles of dopamine, octopamine, and serotonin in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2013 Jan;193(1):159-76. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.142042. Epub 2012 Oct 19. Genetics. 2013. PMID: 23086220 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the period-dependent circadian clock on diurnal, circadian, and aperiodic gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9;99(14):9562-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132269699. Epub 2002 Jun 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. PMID: 12089325 Free PMC article.
-
Functional analysis of circadian pacemaker neurons in Drosophila melanogaster.J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2531-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1234-05.2006. J Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 16510731 Free PMC article.
-
The Pyrexia transient receptor potential channel mediates circadian clock synchronization to low temperature cycles in Drosophila melanogaster.Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 7;280(1768):20130959. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0959. Print 2013 Oct 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23926145 Free PMC article.
-
Visual mutations reveal opposing effects of illumination on arousal in Drosophila.Genetics. 2008 Apr;178(4):2413-6. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.085324. Genetics. 2008. PMID: 18430958 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials