Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?
- PMID: 8490378
- PMCID: PMC1677295
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6881.840
Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?
Abstract
Balancing the risks of prolonged gestation against those of induced labour is difficult. Risks to the fetus increase slightly after 42 weeks' gestation but women having labour induced are more likely to have instrumental deliveries or babies with low Apgar scores. Since many women are now expressing a preference for minimal interference in childbirth the most acceptable management of post-term pregnancy seems to be increased fetal surveillance. Each case needs to be considered individually and it is important that the woman is involved in the decision to induce.
Comment in
-
Induction of labour at term. Women not for waiting.BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1413-b. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8518626 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Induction of labour at term. Evidence on outcome favours induction.BMJ. 1993 May 22;306(6889):1413-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6889.1413-c. BMJ. 1993. PMID: 8518627 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources