Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Jan-Feb;84(1):18-30.

[Socioeconomic status and coronary disease: theories, research methods, epidemiological evidence and the results of Italian studies]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8492732
Review

[Socioeconomic status and coronary disease: theories, research methods, epidemiological evidence and the results of Italian studies]

[Article in Italian]
M Ferrario et al. Med Lav. 1993 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

This review covers the most important theoretic contributions and results of epidemiological research on the relationship between socio-economic status (SES) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Two major approaches have been identified: those of the British and American schools. In spite of differences in method, most of published contributions have shown social inequalities in the outcome of most degenerative disorders. Similar patterns have been detected for the CHD: the time trend declines documented in recent years in most industrialized countries has not filled in the gap of SES difference in the incidence and mortality for CHD, which even seems to have increased in the lower social classes. Moreover, an apparent paradox has been described: even though CHD is typical of welfare societies, its impact is higher in the lower social classes. Recent results of Italian studies are reported which investigated the relationship between CHD risk factors and SES in representative samples. The findings suggest the presence, in Italy, too, of social discrepancies in the prevalence of major risk factors, in both gender groups. This should be taken in consideration when preventive programmes are planned in populations or in work settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources