Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 May;10(3):175-81.

Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8495679
Comparative Study

Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia

F M Ratcliffe et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May.

Abstract

A comparison was made of the acid-base and Apgar status of neonates following general (n = 34), spinal (n = 28) and epidural (n = 23) anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Neonates delivered following spinal anaesthesia were more acidaemic (pH = 7.249) (P < 0.05) than those delivered following epidural (pH = 7.291) or general anaesthesia (pH = 7.296) despite measures taken to minimize hypotension. The percentage of neonates with a 1 min Apgar score > or = 7 was 96% after epidural anaesthesia, 93% after spinal anaesthesia and 75% after general anaesthesia. The difference between epidural and general anaesthesia was significant (P < 0.05). Using these two measures of neonatal wellbeing, epidural anaesthesia provided the most favourable outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources