Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Jun;59(6):365-70.

Negative trauma celiotomy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8507061

Negative trauma celiotomy

V J Henderson et al. Am Surg. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

A retrospective review of 525 consecutive exploratory celiotomies for abdominal trauma occurring between January 1987 and June 1990 in an urban trauma center was conducted. One hundred-fifteen patients sustained blunt abdominal trauma (21%), and 410 patients sustained penetrating abdominal trauma (78%). Penetrating injuries included 260 gunshot wounds and 150 stab wounds. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A (16%), no visceral injuries identified at exploration (true negative); Group B, positive operative findings at celiotomy requiring no operative repair (10%) (nontherapeutic celiotomy); and Group C (74%), injuries encountered requiring operative repair (true positive). A positive exploration rate of 90 per cent with blunt trauma is acceptable using diagnostic techniques currently available. Similarly, a positive exploration rate of 85 per cent in gunshot wounds warrants our continued use of mandatory celiotomy. A 36 per cent combined incidence of true negatives and nontherapeutic celiotomies (Group A and B) is unacceptably high. To reduce this high incidence will require improved clinical surveillance and the controlled implementation of newer diagnostic techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms