Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces
- PMID: 8509102
- DOI: 10.1177/001872089303500110
Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces
Abstract
The effects of lifting boxes without handles, pulling long distances, carrying different size boxes, combining three handling tasks, and lifting with extended horizontal reach were studied using a psychophysical methodology. Six male industrial workers performed 42 variations of lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, and carrying tasks. Lifting boxes without handles produced consistent decreases (median, 16%) in maximum acceptable weights when compared with lifting boxes with handles. Lifting with extended horizontal reach (approximately 48 cm) produced consistent decreases (median, 48%) in maximum acceptable weights when compared with lifting close to the body (approximately 17 cm). No significant heart rate or oxygen consumption differences occurred in either of these variables. No significant differences in maximum acceptable weight of carry were observed among box sizes; however, the maximum acceptable force of pulling was lower for longer (15.2 m) pulling tasks. The maximum acceptable weight for combination tasks was similar to that of the limiting component.
Similar articles
-
The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.Ergonomics. 1991 Sep;34(9):1197-213. doi: 10.1080/00140139108964855. Ergonomics. 1991. PMID: 1743178
-
Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers.Ergonomics. 2008 May;51(5):593-601. doi: 10.1080/00140130701733590. Ergonomics. 2008. PMID: 18432440
-
The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.Appl Ergon. 2007 Jan;38(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.02.001. Epub 2006 Apr 17. Appl Ergon. 2007. PMID: 16616883 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1125-44. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966879. Ergonomics. 1989. PMID: 2680481 Review.
-
The psychophysical approach to manual materials handling task design.Ergonomics. 1999 Jan;42(1):17-31. doi: 10.1080/001401399185775. Ergonomics. 1999. PMID: 9973869 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.Int J Ind Ergon. 2014 Mar;44(2):281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.005. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014. PMID: 26664045 Free PMC article.
-
Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Jun;84(5):569-75. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0589-0. Epub 2010 Oct 16. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011. PMID: 20953621
-
Effect of systematic ergonomic hazard identification and control implementation on musculoskeletal disorder and injury risk.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Jan;40(1):57-65. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3394. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014. PMID: 24142048 Free PMC article.
-
Psychophysically determining the maximum acceptable weight of lift for polypropylene laminated bags.Ind Health. 2016 Dec 7;54(6):550-553. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0040. Epub 2016 May 14. Ind Health. 2016. PMID: 27181917 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Heavy Load Carrying on Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability Among Women in Shinyanga Region, Tanzania.Ann Glob Health. 2020 Feb 21;86(1):17. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2470. Ann Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32110509 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources