Annotation: methodological and conceptual issues in research on childhood resilience
- PMID: 8509489
- PMCID: PMC4269552
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01030.x
Annotation: methodological and conceptual issues in research on childhood resilience
Abstract
Recent advances in research on childhood resilience have yielded valuable insights on protective processes in adjustment. At the same time, however, as with any growing discipline, the rapid accrual of data has led to the identification of additional important questions, many of which are currently inadequately resolved. The focus of this paper is on salient methodological and conceptual issues that merit further scrutiny in research on resilience. The discussion focuses in turn on definitions of competence, measurement of risk, terminology used to describe protective mechanisms, main effect and interaction effect models of resilience, and processes underlying “buffering” or “moderating” effects.
Figures
References
-
- Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
-
- Anderson CR. Locus of control, coping behaviors, and performance in a stress setting: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1977;62:446–451. - PubMed
-
- Averill JR. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin. 1973;80:286–303.
-
- Baldwin AL, Baldwin C, Cole RE. Stress-resistant families and stress-resistant children. In: Rolf J, Masten AS, Cicchetti D, Nuechterlein KH, Weintraub S, editors. Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 257–280.
-
- Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1979. Reliability and validity assessment.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
