Low threshold endocaridal electrodes for permanent cardiac pacing. Comparison between one large and two small surface electrodes
- PMID: 851042
Low threshold endocaridal electrodes for permanent cardiac pacing. Comparison between one large and two small surface electrodes
Abstract
Three different electrodes, i.e. conventional large and small surface endocardial electrodes and a new large contact area-small active surface electrode, have been compared with respect to their stimulation thresholds for cardiac pacing in 94 patients with 96 electrodes. Both capacitor discharge and constant current pulses were used for the measurements. The average 2 msec impulse threshold for the 47 mm(2) electrode reached its maximum on the 14th postoperative day and was 3.6+/-1.4 V and 4.4+/-1.8 mA. One month after insertion, the threshold was 3.2+/-1.4 V and 3.9+/-1.7 mA. Corresponding values after one month for the 6 mm(2) electrode were 2.0+/-1.0 V and 1.7+/-0.9 mA and for the new electrode 1.7+/-0.9 V and 1.4+/-0.8 mA. Thresholds increased by about 20% when the impulse duration was diminished from 2 to 0.5 msec. The new large area-small active surface electrode offers advantages of significantly smaller increases in stimulation thresholds during the first month after insertion and good attachment to the endocardium.
Similar articles
-
A low-threshold, non-dislocating endocardial electrode.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976 Aug;72(2):259-64. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976. PMID: 957741
-
[Electrode surface areas, pulse duration and stimulation threshold. Acute and chronic study with endocardial unipolar electrodes (author's transl)].G Ital Cardiol. 1977;7(4):380-6. G Ital Cardiol. 1977. PMID: 863147 Italian.
-
Relationship between pacemaker fibrillation thresholds and electrode area.Med Instrum. 1975 Jul-Aug;9(4):165-70. Med Instrum. 1975. PMID: 1143115
-
Porous electrodes: concept, technology and results.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 Mar;6(2 Pt 2):427-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04384.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983. PMID: 6189088 Review.
-
Do electrode and lead design differences for permanent cardiac pacing translate into clinically demonstrable differences? (Comparison of sintered platinum and activated vitreous and porous carbon electrodes).Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Aug;12(8):1419-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb05057.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989. PMID: 2476767 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources