Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Jul 1;72(1):73-7.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90222-x.

Results of percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy in young adults

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Results of percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy in young adults

C Röthlisberger et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

The results of percutaneous balloon mitral valvotomy (PBMV) were evaluated in 235 young patients (mean age 29 +/- 11 years) with symptomatic rheumatic mitral stenosis, and the single-balloon Inoue technique was compared with the double-balloon Mansfield technique. PBMV was associated with a significant increase in Gorlin mitral valve area (0.78 +/- 0.23 to 1.61 +/- 0.64 cm2; p < 0.001), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class (2.78 +/- 0.59 to 1.28 +/- 0.58; p < 0.001). Mitral regurgitation increased significantly (0.4 +/- 0.6 to 1.3 +/- 1.0; p < 0.001), but was significant (> or = 3+) only in 19 patients (8%). Comparison of the Inoue and Mansfield techniques showed a significantly lower Gorlin mitral valve area after PBMV (1.55 +/- 0.56 vs 1.74 +/- 0.74 cm2; p < 0.05), but a lower incidence of mitral regurgitation by color Doppler echocardiography (1.1 +/- 0.7 vs 1.5 +/- 0.8; p < 0.05) in the Inoue group. Patients were divided into those with nonpliable (valve score > 8; group I) and pliable (score < or = 8; group II) valves. Although significant increases in mitral valve area were obtained in both groups, mitral valve area by planimetry was significantly lower in group I (1.49 +/- 0.46 vs 1.86 +/- 0.44 cm2; p < 0.05), whereas there was no difference in the amount of color Doppler mitral regurgitation (1.5 +/- 1.0 vs 1.2 +/- 0.7; p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Dilation versus dilatation.
    Cheng TO. Cheng TO. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 15;73(5):421. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90030-2. Am J Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 8109567 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources