Quality assessment of economic evaluations in selected pharmacy, medical, and health economics journals
- PMID: 8520080
- DOI: 10.1177/106002809502907-805
Quality assessment of economic evaluations in selected pharmacy, medical, and health economics journals
Abstract
Objective: To assess and compare the quality of economic studies in selected pharmacy, medical, and health economics journals.
Data sources: DICP The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Pharmacy, New England Journal of Medicine, Medical Care, Journal of the American Medical Association, PharmacoEconomics, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, and Journal of Health Economics using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Search terms included "economic," "cost," and "cost analysis."
Study selection: Reviewers appraised abstracts to identify original research published during 1989-1993 comparing costs and outcomes between drugs, treatments, and/or services. Initially, 123 articles met criteria; 16 were inappropriate, 17 were randomized out, and 90 (73%) were used (30/group).
Data extraction: Quality was assessed using a 13-item checklist. Interrater reliability was 0.91 (p < 0.05) for 9 raters, test-retest reliability was 0.94 (p < 0.001).
Data synthesis: A 2-way ANOVA, with overall quality scores as a dependent variable with journal type and year as independent variables, was significant (F = 2.79, p = 0.002, r2 = 0.34), with no significant interaction (F = 0.71, p = 0.68) or time effect (F = 0.70, p = 0.60). Journal types differed; pharmacy journals scored significantly lower (chi 2 = 53.89, df = 2, p < 0.001). Items rated adequate (i.e., correct or acceptable) increased over time (chi 2 = 21.18, df = 4, p < 0.001). Ethical issues and study perspective most needed improvement.
Conclusions: Article quality for all journal types increased over time nonsignificantly; health economics journals scored highest, then medical journals, with pharmacy journals significantly lower (and having the highest standard deviation). We recommend that authors and reviewers pay closer attention to study perspective and ethical implications.
Similar articles
-
Sensitivity analysis in health economic and pharmacoeconomic studies. An appraisal of the literature.Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jan;11(1):75-88. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711010-00009. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997. PMID: 10165529
-
Quality assessment of pharmacoeconomic abstracts of original research articles in selected journals.Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Apr;31(4):423-8. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100406. Ann Pharmacother. 1997. PMID: 9101002
-
Economic Evaluation of Hospital and Community Pharmacy Services.Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jan;51(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/1060028016667741. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Ann Pharmacother. 2017. PMID: 27586430 Review.
-
Quality assessment of published health economic analyses from South America.Ann Pharmacother. 2006 May;40(5):943-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G296. Epub 2006 May 2. Ann Pharmacother. 2006. PMID: 16670369 Review.
-
Accuracy of abstracts for original research articles in pharmacy journals.Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1173-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D416. Epub 2004 May 18. Ann Pharmacother. 2004. PMID: 15150375
Cited by
-
Ontario's formulary committee: how recommendations are made.Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(4):285-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321040-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003. PMID: 12600223
-
Quality assessment of economic evaluations published in PharmacoEconomics. The first four years (1992 to 1995).Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Dec;12(6):685-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712060-00008. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997. PMID: 10175980
-
Sensitivity analysis in health economic and pharmacoeconomic studies. An appraisal of the literature.Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jan;11(1):75-88. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711010-00009. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997. PMID: 10165529
-
Examining the quality of health economic analyses submitted to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board in Sweden. The first year.Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Dec;5(4):351-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0246-1. Eur J Health Econ. 2004. PMID: 15452738
-
Methodologic quality of cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical procedures.Ann Surg. 2007 Jan;245(1):147-51. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231802.83152.59. Ann Surg. 2007. PMID: 17197978 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous