Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of erythropoietin improves its efficiency for the treatment of anaemia in haemodialysis patients

Abstract

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) seems to be more efficient when given subcutaneously (SC) instead of intravenously (IV) for therapy of anaemia in haemodialysis patients. This was a cross-over study designed to assess the efficiency of rHuEpo when given SC rather than IV in a 1 year follow-up. Sixteen patients received IV rHuEpo for 6 months, then SC rHuEpo for 6 months. They were four males and 12 females with a mean age of 56 years (range 15-82). Haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) was kept at 10 g/dl and transferrin saturation (TS) at more than 25%. Mean [Hb] was 9.7 +/- 1.0 g/dl with IV rHuEpo and 9.9 +/- 0.9 g/dl with SC rHuEpo (NS). Transferrin saturation was 27% before rHuEpo, 31% with IV rHuEpo and 34% with SC rHuEpo (NS vs IV rHuEpo). Serum ferritin was 691 +/- 113 ng/ml before rHuEpo, 652 +/- 94 ng/ml with IV rHuEpo and 997 +/- 132 ng/ml with SC rHuEpo (P < 0.05 vs IV rHuEpo). Intact parathyroid hormone was 354 +/- 83 pg/ml before rHuEpo, 201 +/- 63 pg/ml with IV rHuEpo and 122 +/- 33 pg/ml with SC rHuEpo (NS vs IV rHuEpo). Doses of IV rHuEpo were 156 +/- 24 U/kg/week and SC rHuEpo 74 +/- 13 U/kg/week (i.e. a saving of 53%; P < 0.001). We conclude that subcutaneous administration of rHuEpo is twice as efficient as IV rHuEpo in patients with good functional iron reserve.