Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Sep;24(5):485-91.
doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1077.

Evaluating the efficacy of the National Cholesterol Education Program adult treatment guidelines: cholesterol lowering intervention program

Affiliations

Evaluating the efficacy of the National Cholesterol Education Program adult treatment guidelines: cholesterol lowering intervention program

A W Caggiula et al. Prev Med. 1995 Sep.

Abstract

Background: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted to test the feasibility of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel I Guidelines (ATPI) in physician office practices.

Methods: Twenty-two physician practices in communities from western Pennsylvania and West Virginia were recruited. Using a patient tracking system, 9,171 patients were assessed for cholesterol screening and treatment by their physicians according to the ATPI guidelines.

Results: Cholesterol screening was ordered for 1,698 patients or 19% of the population visiting the physician offices. The reasons for not screening included the patient was already under therapy (2,371), screened within the past 5 years (1,714), or acutely ill at the time of the visit (1,691). The frequency of patient refusal for screening was low (444). However, the majority of patient diagnoses were based on a single lipid measurement, and only 817 or 56% of patients evaluated had lipoprotein measures obtained prior to treatment. Follow-up measurement was not performed according to the ATPI schedule, and the magnitude of cholesterol response was inversely related to time to first follow-up measurement.

Conclusions: Many patients in these physician practices had initial cholesterol screening. However, repeat measurements as recommended for initial evaluation were not performed routinely, nor were most patients followed within the recommended 3-month time period. This lack of follow-up is detrimental to effective, long-term patient management since the magnitude of the cholesterol response is related to time of the first follow-up measurement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources